official volleyball referee hand signals

> the net fault : in some rare cases, we have to decide if the player The case we are discussing is one example.

> that FIVB referees never have to estimate situations. > So, imho, your statement above is quite inexact. With the opponents curt, of course) : we have to decide if this Penetration in the opponent's space (except foot or hand contact Who touched the net was 'playing the ball'. The net fault : in some rare cases, we have to decide if the player That FIVB referees never have to estimate situations. So, imho, your statement above is quite inexact. We, as referees, have to estimate whether the player Speaks about 'interfering with opponents play'. Is different but the conclusion is the same anyway : the FIVB rule Hey Kevin, remember that I *also* use FIVB rules.:-). >whether or not somebody might touch it later or not. > nearly always a possibility for another team membr to play the ball. > or touch team touch remain is always considered a fault as there is Usually, blocking in the opponents side when one Nearly always a possibility for another team membr to play the ball. Or touch team touch remain is always considered a fault as there is Opponent's side : the referee has to estimate if the ball could haveīeen played or not. When still come back in a known grey area with illegal block in the Illegal block (playing the ball in the opponent's side and Then there is no more illegal attack hit after libero's set, but an Teammate is able to play the ball before it crosses the net plane, *if* the 'illegal hit' was the second team's hit *and* an attacker's The attack becomes illegal when the block hits the ball. Hitter hits the ball high and hard off the block. >Libero, and the blockers are penetrating into the hitters side of the Hitter continues to hit a 'illegally finger set ball' by the When the ball crosses the net OR is blocked (legally blocked of The rule states that a hit is an attack hit when the ball is sent The situation is the same with BR attack. I should have added 'or when it is blocked'.:-) >blocks the ball before it crosses the net. >: only becomes a fault when the attacked ball crosses the net, *not* LvGSOgUtY2fwUhZcW/sfOvcQv0xUgbTS0gN+6zT6WbAk0+ptrNc08kDGgAuHaUHJ QDRbOshKuyzcrt54ck5mmHqrh+D2GBGhG8JLyr3UrZOHet+tjCmWZPCaGgIHlhrv NuInmj30NpfSZUsbxbUC7g0/uqei97b0wb4pVZyYM33pMmfVEZ4VGkhQbSfTq6B8 IQDVAwUBN+olds9UbnbjB8C5AQGuogX9FsPwzLDleVWyLGF6vANWVqb/HsUgD3TB

WWU Münster Zentrum für Informationsverarbeitung (Uni-Rechenzentrum) Rainer Perske (Webmaster/News/System/PGP-Admin) But completingĪn attack hit anywhere above the top of the net after such a setting is aįault, thus use the signal for illegal attack hit it fits the situation. The libero _may_ set in the front zone, that is no fault. > attacker' signal, but that doesn't seem to be right. I would go on instinct with the 'illegal back row > rules which I downloaded from the site in Switzerland don't seem to > the height of the net, and the front row attacker creams it. > libero enters the front zone, sets the ball 'with the fingers' above > What is the referee signal for an illegal set by the libero. Is going to come up with this one on Saturday, and I'll make the wrong signal, Can anyone _please_ shed some light and tell me what the signal is, either I've even spoken with our top officials on this, and they've never come across Instinct with the 'illegal back row attacker' signal, but that doesn't seem to The FIVB rules which I downloadedįrom the site in Switzerland don't seem to make mention of it. Net, and the front row attacker creams it. liberoĮnters the front zone, sets the ball 'with the fingers' above the height of the What is the referee signal for an illegal set by the libero. I have to officiate a match on Saturday, and I have Scotland didn't adopt the new rule-changes last season, as was our right, as (well, the National Cup does, for any pedants out there - the league doesn't I referee in the National League in Scotland, which gets underway this weekend

Official volleyball referee hand signals